WASHINGTON – Tweaking the way the government measures inflation sounds like an obscure method to help reduce budget deficits, but over time it would lead to significantly lower Social Security benefits while increasing taxes, mainly on low- and middle-income families.
If adopted across the government, the change would have far-reaching effects because so many programs are adjusted each year based on year-to-year changes in consumer prices.
It would mean smaller annual increases in Social Security payments, government pensions and veterans’ benefits. Taxes would slowly increase because annual adjustments to income tax brackets would be smaller, pushing more people into higher tax brackets.
Over time, fewer people would be eligible for antipoverty programs like Medicaid, Head Start, food stamps, school lunches and home heating assistance because annual adjustments to the poverty level would be smaller, leaving fewer people under the official poverty line.
House Republicans proposed the new inflation measure Monday as part of a 10-year, $2.2 trillion plan to avoid the year-end fiscal cliff, a combination of automatic tax increases and spending cuts that economists warn could send the economy back into recession. They also proposed raising the eligibility age for Medicare from 65 to 67, and raising taxes by $800 billion.
President Obama supported the new inflation measure in deficit-reduction talks last year. That increases the possibility it could become part of a compromise, although White House officials have said they oppose including changes to Social Security in the current talks.
Obama sidestepped the issue in a broadcast interview Tuesday.
I am willing to look at anything that strengthens our system and makes it, and makes it clear over the long term that the basic social safety net for our seniors is going to be there, Obama said on Bloomberg Television.
The measure being considered is called the Chained Consumer Price Index. On average, it shows a lower level of inflation than the more widely used Consumer Price Index.
The chained CPI assumes that as prices rise, consumers turn to lower-cost alternatives, reducing the amount of inflation they experience. For example, if the price of beef increases while the price of pork does not, people will buy more pork. Or, as opponents argue mockingly, if the price of home heating oil rises, people will turn down their heat and wear more sweaters.
The new inflation measure is unpopular among many Democrats in Congress and advocates for seniors who complain that it would disproportionately hit low- and middle-income families. AARP and other groups have been fighting it for years.
But the new inflation measure is popular among budget hawks in part because it cuts benefits and increases taxes gradually in ways that might not be readily apparent to most Americans. The savings, however, become substantial over time, adding up to more than $200 billion over the next decade, according to congressional estimates.
It’s a proposal with bipartisan support because it more accurately reflects the changes in costs, said Michael Steel, spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio.
For the more than 56 million people who get Social Security, the new measure would reduce annual cost-of-living adjustments, or COLAs. Next year’s increase is scheduled to be 1.7 percent. Under the chained CPI, it would be about 1.4 percent.
Seniors who on average get about $14,000 in Social Security benefits a year are going to get, on average, about a $21 a month increase in their benefits to pay for all the increased costs of their medicine, increased cost of their rent, increased cost of daily living – $21 a month, said Rep. Xavier Becerra of California, the top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Social Security subcommittee.
Once the change is phased in, yearly Social Security benefits for a typical middle-income 65-year-old would be about $136 less, according to an analysis of Social Security data. At age 75, annual benefits under the new index would be $560 less. At 85, the cut would be $984 a year.